PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SKOR vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between SKOR and ^GSPC is 0.10, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.1

Performance

SKOR vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

50.00%100.00%150.00%200.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
31.94%
164.63%
SKOR
^GSPC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

SKOR:

1.71

^GSPC:

0.28

Sortino Ratio

SKOR:

2.50

^GSPC:

0.53

Omega Ratio

SKOR:

1.32

^GSPC:

1.08

Calmar Ratio

SKOR:

1.07

^GSPC:

0.28

Martin Ratio

SKOR:

7.20

^GSPC:

1.31

Ulcer Index

SKOR:

0.88%

^GSPC:

4.06%

Daily Std Dev

SKOR:

3.70%

^GSPC:

18.90%

Max Drawdown

SKOR:

-15.98%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

SKOR:

-1.45%

^GSPC:

-12.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SKOR achieves a 1.18% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -8.25% return. Over the past 10 years, SKOR has underperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 2.61%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively higher 10.02% annualized return.


SKOR

YTD

1.18%

1M

-0.28%

6M

0.41%

1Y

6.91%

5Y*

1.57%

10Y*

2.61%

^GSPC

YTD

-8.25%

1M

-4.30%

6M

-7.20%

1Y

6.61%

5Y*

14.07%

10Y*

10.02%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SKOR vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKOR
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of SKOR is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of SKOR is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of SKOR is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of SKOR is 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of SKOR is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of SKOR is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 6262
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

SKOR vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SKOR, currently valued at 1.71, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.00
SKOR: 1.71
^GSPC: 0.28
The chart of Sortino ratio for SKOR, currently valued at 2.50, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.00
SKOR: 2.50
^GSPC: 0.53
The chart of Omega ratio for SKOR, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.50
SKOR: 1.32
^GSPC: 1.08
The chart of Calmar ratio for SKOR, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.00
SKOR: 1.07
^GSPC: 0.28
The chart of Martin ratio for SKOR, currently valued at 7.20, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.00
SKOR: 7.20
^GSPC: 1.31

The current SKOR Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SKOR and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.71
0.28
SKOR
^GSPC

Drawdowns

SKOR vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKOR drawdown since its inception was -15.98%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKOR and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-1.45%
-12.17%
SKOR
^GSPC

Volatility

SKOR vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares Credit-Scored US Corporate Bond Index Fund (SKOR) is 1.89%, while S&P 500 (^GSPC) has a volatility of 13.54%. This indicates that SKOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1.89%
13.54%
SKOR
^GSPC
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab